COPA 在“中本聪”审判中向克雷格·赖特施加压力

欧易(OKX)

用戶喜愛的交易所

立即注冊立即下载

币安(Binance)

已有账号登陆后会弹出下载

立即注冊立即下载

英国高等法院正在进行的 COPA 程序已进入第二周，该程序涉及澳大利亚计算机科学家克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright)，他是比特币起源争论的核心人物。

在激烈的质证过程中，赖特发现自己与主审法官和对方律师发生了冲突，对方律师要求他停止一连串“无关紧要的指控”，集中精力讨论案件的核心问题。

COPA 审判第二周：克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 的陈述

赖特的声明和反驳一直是这一进程的焦点，该进程由加密货币开放专利联盟（COPA）发起，这是一个由加密货币行业知名人士支持的非营利组织。

COPA 声称克雷格·赖特（Craig Wright）进行了“工业规模”的伪造，试图证明自己是比特币的创造者（化名中本聪）。

在审判期间，克雷格·赖特继续将其论点不一致的责任归咎于各种个人和实体。

这种趋势在他最近的盘问中得到了延续，赖特对加密货币社区的成员提出了新的指控，同时面临着在法庭上提供相互矛盾的叙述的指控。

当赖特指责 COPA 成员实施“金钱上下波动的骗局”时，双方的言论达到了顶峰，促使主审法官詹姆斯·梅勒介入。

梅勒提醒赖特，此案的目标是确定他是否真正是中本聪，并强调有关比特币系统当前状态的争论与诉讼程序无关。

尽管赖特试图通过将不一致归咎于外部因素（例如第三方编辑的错误归因错误以及他前妻与疾病的斗争）来转移审查，但对方律师、Bird & Bird LLP 的乔纳森·霍夫（Jonathan Hough）仍然冷漠地质疑赖特的观点。索赔。

赖特之前的证词之间的不一致之处

赖特之前的证词与他目前关于比特币历史关键事件的说法之间存在明显差异，这引发了霍夫关于赖特账户一致性的具体问题。

一个值得注意的案例涉及赖特的声明，即他在 2009 年比特币诞生时并没有高度重视，这与他之前关于他参与比特币创建的声明相矛盾。

赖特表示，他认为比特币只是一种获得合作伙伴关系或教授职位的潜在方式，淡化了他在比特币发展中的作用。

However, Hough’s examination of Wright’s testimony revealed inconsistencies and contradictions, highlighting the challenges that Wright must face to prove his claims. Despite Wright’s insistence on the truthfulness of his account, the evolving nature of his statements raises doubts about their reliability.

In addition, Wright’s announcement of the discovery of a new “box” of evidence, presumably brought to light by his wife, adds an additional level of complexity to the process.

This development can prolong the process and further complicate the evaluation of the evidence presented by both parties.

As Wright’s cross-examination extends to the fifth day, the court remains focused on uncovering the truth behind his statements.

The incessant examination by the opposing lawyer and the presiding judge underscores the importance of this trial in determining the legitimacy of Wright’s claim as the inventor of Bitcoin.

Regardless of the outcome, the process represents a crucial moment in the ongoing saga about the origins of Bitcoin, shedding light on the complexities and controversies inherent in the realm of cryptocurrencies.

As Wright’s testimony continues to undergo intense scrutiny, the court’s verdict will have far-reaching implications for the future of Bitcoin and the broader crypto ecosystem.

What does Craig Wright’s COPA process entail for the entire crypto ecosystem

Beyond the judicial drama, the trial also highlights broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry and the concept of intellectual property within decentralized ecosystems.

The legal challenge of COPA against Wright reflects a concerted effort within the cryptocurrency community to protect innovation and prevent the exploitation of fundamental technologies for personal purposes.

At the center of the issue lies the problem of the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and the legacy of Bitcoin’s creation. Since the birth of Bitcoin, the enigmatic figure of Nakamoto has captured the imagination of enthusiasts and scholars.

The prospect of unmasking Nakamoto has fueled intense speculation and debate, with Wright’s claim of the pseudonym sparking controversy and skepticism within the cryptographic community.

The outcome of the process has significant consequences for the credibility and legitimacy of Wright’s claims and for the broader perception of the origins of Bitcoin. If Wright fails to prove his claims in court, this could undermine his credibility and raise doubts about his role in the creation of Bitcoin.

On the contrary, a favorable verdict for Wright could strengthen his reputation and potentially reshape the narrative about the birth of Bitcoin.

In addition, the process highlights the difficulties of establishing ownership and intellectual property rights within decentralized systems like Bitcoin.

与受集中机构和法律框架管辖的传统形式的知识产权不同，加密货币在优先考虑去中心化和透明度的分布式网络上运行。

因此，确定这些系统中的所有权和亲子关系提出了传统法律机制可能难以解决的独特挑战。

结论

无论该过程的结果如何，它都不太可能最终解决有关比特币起源的争论。围绕中本聪身份的谜团注定会持续存在，让密码学界的猜测和阴谋永久化。

然而，这一过程代表了探索比特币历史和加密货币领域更广泛演变的关键时刻。

随着对赖特的盘问继续，焦点仍然集中在法庭诉讼上。 Wright 和 COPA 之间的法律斗争概括了揭开比特币创造之谜所涉及的紧张局势和复杂性。

无论审判最终使叙述变得清晰还是进一步复杂化，其意义都超越了法庭，塑造了密码学界内外的看法和讨论。

归根结底，这个过程代表了比特币起源传奇中的关键时刻，见证了围绕世界上最著名的加密货币的魅力和争议。

在此过程中，观察者和参与者正在等待裁决，该裁决将对整个加密货币领域产生影响，影响未来几年的看法、叙述和辩论。

热点：中本聪 克雷格 赖特